Paul Joseph WatsonAccount verificato

They were banned from Twitter months ago, for violating the ToS. Why should running for political office grant them access to Twitter if they can't follow the ToS?

Paul's more a 'feelings' kinda guy. Don't come here with facts.

I am in no mood to listen to his rendition of "Feelings".

Carl had a previous account suspended. Ya dishonest hack

*multiple

Yeah, but those were all for ban evasion

Owned lmao

It's amazing how leftists keep giving more likes on their own tweets to make it seem like more people support them. If this isn't ego-stroking and circlejerking, I don't know what is. But who am I to criticize, they're perfect and divine in every way. According to themselves...

Me liking my own comments is what you respond to instead of my question to you, perfect. Surely, it's the gravest of sins to do such a thing. I guess my other reply automatically doesn't matter at this point, I don't even have a social studies degree, after all.

Regardless of your political view, this IS election meddling @Twitter

No it's ban evasion

That may be the specific "justification" given but it still amounts to the same thing.

No one has the right to use a megaphone owned by a private company, so it doesn't amount to anything and has nothing to do with rights being infringed.

That in itself gives the private company too much political influence. With great power and influence comes great responsibility. This is how many dictatorships have stayed that way over the years. Censorship gets us nowhere.

Are you in favour of state-owned social media platforms then?

Look Morker I'm a libertarian. I fully understand Twitter is private and have a legal right to do what they want. But the other side of the coin is of course that the market can exert pressure. And I maintain Twitter is using it's freedoms to be HIGHLY IMMORAL. It's disgusting.

"I'm a Libertarian, I fully understand [...]" Highly unlikely