Great, but per the link you mean "INclusive," right? Also, rhetoric is surprisingly othering of those with "disabilities" [sic].
Replying to @userX
We did mean "inclusive." Thank you. We also noticed the link in our original tweet was broken so we replaced it with an update.
8:01 AM - 11 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.