No, Democrats are entirely legitimately asking about her running a Thai black site allegedly to torture people. Her gender is completely irrelevant to that particular question.http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-43496212 …
-
-
-
The Washington Post article saying that appointing her would be a direct endorsement of torture:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/confirming-gina-haspel-would-be-a-direct-endorsement-of-torture/2018/05/03/098b1c78-4994-11e8-8b5a-3b1697adcc2a_story.html?utm_term=.80ccbe53c6fc …
- 10 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I mean wtf Sarah. Can u not see the hypocrisy of ur argument here? HRC was also “the most qualified candidate”. Didn’t see you backing HER for POTUS, based on some BS female empowerment theory.
-
Female empowerment is STILL about supporting the best candidate, not ANY woman. Sanders herself is a prime example of a woman in leadership I don’t support. KellyAnn Conway set prescidents as a female leader spearheading a winning campaign - but again, NO. She’s a HOT MESS!
- 4 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Their only issue is that President Trump wants her...other than that they'd probably be dancing.
-
That seems to say if it weren't for Trump, democrats would support empowering a woman. Remember Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton. Sarah had actual achievement.pic.twitter.com/9PmZAizkXP
Ce média pour contenir un document offensant. En savoir plus
- 10 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
- 17 réponses de plus
-
-
-
TORTURE SARAH - TORTURE IS THE REASON WHY SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED - U RIDICULOUS TRUMP LOVING IDIOT !
#SHSguiltyLIAR -
When are you moving to Canada? Asking for a friend.
- 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.