Good morning. We’re still getting emails and thoughtful responses about that article we posted yesterday concerning free image sites. We’re aware that you want to hear more from us. (Thread)
We are taking your concerns to heart, and we’ll be working on this in the days ahead. Let’s keep talking.
-
-
One step is to finally accept photojournalists ARE journalists - and the images we create ARE journalism. The work we do is deserving not just of being properly compensated, but respected as well. We are not "concerns", we ARE journalists. 1
-
You made a huge mistake. Admit it. You're compounding the error by dismissing photojournalism, not only in the original story, but in the "Aw shucks. Both Sides!" BS you're spitting out now. 2
-
You,
@Poynter, are still pussyfooting around about this, trying, I guess, to salvage some kind of face. Well what didn't get tossed out the window when the editor hit send on an article that blithely dismissed an entire branch of journalists - 3 -
Is getting kissed off with the big ol' Okey Doke you've been trying to paper over this mess with. Insult meet injury. 4
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In our Leadership Academy (‘14), Kenny Irby provided a solid voice for visuals among mostly word editors. Consider including strong visual reportage leaders on your staff. Newsrooms need influence that more than ever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.