“@Poynter: How to measure success at @ajam: http://bit.ly/1bWfU3l Ratings and revenue, sure, but what about influence and awards?” Vs truth
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Poynter awards and influence which in time will allow for larger subscriber feeds long-term as a unique, must-have channel. -
“
@jason_kint:@Poynter awards and influence which in time will allow for larger subscriber feeds..." This explains why objectivity vanished! -
@TomNocera@Poynter “subscriber feeds” should have read “fees” -
@jason_kint@Poynter You imply there's a pay for propaganda model? Only objective journalism brings value sufficient to support fees. -
@TomNocera@Poynter let’s put aside the politics. A cable news channel needs to prove its value in order to demand larger sub fees. Agreed?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.