Postal Vote Investigation

@PostalVoteProbe

Investigate Postal Vote Fraud for the General Election 2019

Vrijeme pridruživanja: prosinac 2019.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @PostalVoteProbe

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @PostalVoteProbe

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    9m mainly young, low-income, renters and ethnic minorities. The election was called for Dec12 hampering efforts to register these voters as the normal annual canvass (house enquiry forms) on Dec 1st was disrupted. Is this why Labours vote dropped 3m?

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I'm sure sure are covering up fraudulent practice. My partner sent by 1st class post five days before the deadline her postal vote application and was told by Bolton Clown Council it had arrived too late to be processed.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I dont know what the answer is but we must have a process that's open and transparent and we shud fight for that. These tech companies r a law unto themselves and we cant let them have free reign in the elections arena.

    Poništi
  4. Ever since the individual electoral registration was rolled out. And nearly all of the electoral processes were rolled out to private companies, there has been question marks over the results from to GE 2015,2017, 2019 and . There needs to be a proper audit

    Poništi
  5. The worrying thing is that we only got to see this anomaly when provided with data at ward level. Nearly all councils say they don't have data at ward level, and some councils are refusing to publish postal vote stats even at constituency level. There is ZERO transparency

    Poništi
  6. Notable points about stats Rejection rate increased by 56% in tory safe seats( we have figures such as 69 compared to this marginal of 369) Also electorate increased by 3k, turnout by 1k

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. GE2017 for Comparison sent 15270 pv received 12960 pv rejected 207 pv turnout 84.87% pv as % of vote 24.12% pv as % of electorate 20.64% Electorate 73959, votes 53719 2517 postal votes NOT counted (rejected+not returned)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. GE2019 con hold (3562) sent 15567 pv received 13019 pv rejected 369 pv turnout 83.63% pv as % of vote 23.75% pv as % of electorate 20.34% Electorate 76508, votes 54807 2917 postal votes NOT counted (rejected+not returned) thanks

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. . Will you promise to conduct a complete review of the privatization of the electoral system process to software providers. Currently there is zero oversight into the black boxes that print, post, authenticate, process registrations, and help run the yearly canvess

    Poništi
  10. Very Interesting stats for South West . Tory votes increased with postal vote turnout in but only in the marginal SW Phantom Postal Votes? We can only see this when the data is provided at ward level 🙁

    Poništi
  11. you can go to put your postcode in, and it will give you the contact details of your local electoral office. Contact them and ask for a copy of both the scanned application and paper copy. If anything for your own piece of mind

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I have questioned the accuracy of voting b4 with 100’s of students turned away at polling stations. I went to my Local MP and he sent my comments to House of Commons but it happened again this election!

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Yes. The French are showing what we must do. Democracy is dead in the UK.

    Poništi
  14. . some very interesting things about the privatisation of the electoral system are emerging. Registration, printing, posting, authenticating, the whole shabang is privatized and has ZERO oversight

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    European Parliament: Demand Parliamentary Investigation into rigged postal votes - Sign the Petition! via

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 13 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima

    the facts sbout vote rigging etc has never been looked into and we know there was loads esp postal votes. how did the telegraph month before say johnson would win with over 80 seats and truth about the idox system and bbc knowing days before. all the people following Jeremy

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Hey! Has anybody noticed how the POSTAL VOTE SCANDAL keeps growing with more & more evidence mounting up! Yet it seems nobody's interested in publishing anything about it! What do we do if it's found that the GE was rigged? Who do we go to for action & justice? Anybody know? 🧐

    Poništi
  18. . take for example the very marginal wolverhampton south west seat. This correlation only appears in south west wolverhampton, but not in the rest of wolverhampton

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. . we are noticing a strong correlation between high tory votes and high postal vote turnout in wards that are in marignal seats. Endelberry 87.25%, Green 86.12% . what was the tory vote like in those wards? Really worth investigating as electoral services outsourced

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. It Might be nothing, but because the electoral systems are privatized there is every possibility this anomaly was due to phantom postal votes.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. . it might be worthwhile getting the stats by ward across all of derby. In wolverhampton there is a close correlation between postal vote turnout and tory vote. BUT only in the tory target seat of South West

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·