Sorry, I'm shorthanding. I mean Kushner's side of the story (which it pretty clearly is), as conveyed by the sources, whoever they are.
Wait, how do we known it's Kushner's account? The sourcing is "people familiar with the meeting." White House? Intel? Kushner lawyer?https://twitter.com/saletan/status/868513510690566144 …
-
-
-
WAPO making a strong case to replace NYT as my main political resource
-
It's not a contest, for me as a reader. It's an ecosystem. WP gets some stories, NYT gets others. Together they hold government accountable.
-
@nytimes is doing a shitty job imo -
Trump spent months bullying the
@nytimes guess they caved -
I'm not convinced it took that much bullying.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One female reporter
@NYT is way too cozy with the Trump Administration. Therefore, I do not trust her reporting 100%.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NYT editor admitted in a tweet it was Kushner's people, actually. The story was very carefully written.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So far it is merely the story being put forth by those who are trying to resurrect Kushner. Don't hold your breath on Syria line.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not bashing NYT bashing the writer of the article @ NYT. Which is
@maggieNYT i presume?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because Maggie Haberman is on the byline with three national security reporters. Haberman is who Trump & inner circle go to anonymously.
-
But I'm sure you already suspect this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.