WHY DO WE EVEN PAY YOU PEOPLEpic.twitter.com/kjoY9aw9bo
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Another SCOTUS case that yields a standard that sounds like when I ask my mother-in-law how much mustard goes in her potato salad recipe. “not too much!”
but aren't most 1a cases narrowly decided to give them an out?


It's funny because it's true...
I think this will be very helpful to administrators who are genuinely trying to support a student's right to expression while also trying to create a positive learning environment. *some sarcasm added
It's nice that you think Thomas would be charitable enough to use a stick.
Accurate
Thomas' dissent saying that no online speech by a student can be protected since it can be accessed in school is p wild
Does that mean Bible TV and video sermons are illegal now because they can be accessed in the Capitol?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.