This is not on devs or publishers. This lies solely at the feet of gamers with more money than sense who keep buying this shit.
Take-Two: ‘Recurrent consumer spending’ is the way of the future https://www.polygon.com/2017/11/8/16623052/take-two-recurrent-consumer-spending-microtransactions-gta-online?utm_campaign=polygon&utm_content=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter …pic.twitter.com/jB0byzL8KI
-
-
-
i got two words for you: artificial scarcity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
geohell
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its cool to let folks get shark cards and the like. I just want to fucking sell real estate for christ sakepic.twitter.com/6TPcdazqUB
-
It would be cool if they add a marketplace like the ones in forza
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Typo? Super Mario Odyssey not Galaxy released same date as Assassins Creed Origins.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe if they made something that wasn't sports17/18/19...or a new "collectors" edition of an old game they could make money elsewhere
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is why singleplayer games are going to become a niche category in the future. There's no return on investment for the publisher beyond the single $60 the consumer will spend on the game. And sp games like Shadow of War with loot boxes in them are going to be the new normal
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Recurrent consumer spending was the way of the past too. Make good game, consumer buys...rinse/repeat.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.