POLITICO MagazineOvjeren akaunt

@POLITICOMag

Hard-hitting reporting and original ideas about the stories that matter most. Sign up for our weekly email:

Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2013.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @POLITICOMag

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @POLITICOMag

  1. The battle for the White House this year could depend on how well candidates have absorbed the lessons of the last campaign:

    Poništi
  2. Here’s a cheat sheet to help you identify some of the more egregiously misguided political punditry — both about the Iowa caucuses, and the primary contests to come:

    Poništi
  3. The Iowa caucuses might have more than one winner this year. That’s nothing to get upset about.

    Poništi
  4. Iowa's six electoral votes "no longer seem essential, not when states like Texas and Arizona and Georgia — longtime GOP strongholds — all were decided by tighter margins in 2016."

    Poništi
  5. Sometimes, nobody wins. And that's okay.

    Poništi
  6. "If you add up the obvious changes from 2016 to 2020 … you arrive at an ominous conclusion: American elections are no longer solely decided by American voters," writes :

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Happy to be featured in this feature on "the new rules" of campaigning along with & . My take: the era of the "digital living room" is over. Now bad actors are congregating in the digital basement. Read more:

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I contributed a short piece on young people’s embrace of socialism and resentment the rich based on ⁦. Is GenZ actually different than their parents when they were young? Check it out here via ⁦

    Poništi
  9. After decades spent at the center of both parties’ strategies for winning the Electoral College, Iowa is suddenly an afterthought for the general election.

    Poništi
  10. So… what if there's a tie in Iowa?

    Poništi
  11. "A new sentiment has echoed throughout recent conversations with Democratic strategists … a consensus that would have been unthinkable just eight years ago: Iowa is no longer a battleground," writes . "Not in 2020, anyway."

    Poništi
  12. Whatever else comes of the 2020 campaign, it will always have a place in history as The One After Donald Trump Blew It All Up.

    Poništi
  13. "Democracy cannot survive if it’s forced to grapple, constantly, with a flood of stimuli ranging from American children to foreign enemies, with no clear way to filter out the noise."

    Poništi
  14. The New Rules of Campaigning in 2020

    Poništi
  15. "How we change in response to this new reality after 2020 is hard to say, but it is unsustainable."

    Poništi
  16. After tonight, Democrats have no plans to contest a state once seen as a general-election battleground, writes :

    Poništi
  17. "Social media, especially, have internationalized our elections and broadened them beyond voting-age adults. Citizens in any country, of any age, can weigh in and force a candidate or politician to react."

    Poništi
  18. The parties aren’t in control of their own nominations. Fake news can have more impact than fact-checks. Russian intervention in our democracy is real. So is American support for nationalism—and socialism. So, where does that leave us now?

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    What feels weird about these caucuses: The concession from Ds that we’re no longer in a swing state The same demo realities that took Colorado & Virginia off the map for Rs have made Iowa an afterthought for Ds A quintessential battleground, no more:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    1 football game 2 billionaires 3 campaign ads. The first-ever SB presidential ad battle So who won, Bloomberg or Trump?

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·