This EO is a reactionary and politicized approach to a landmark law. #Section230 protects American innovation and freedom of expression, and it’s underpinned by democratic values. Attempts to unilaterally erode it threaten the future of online speech and Internet freedoms.
Conversation
Replying to
If only you had the ability to delete his account...
2
1
18
Replying to
does attempting to unilaterally erode CDA230, thereby threatening the future of online speech and Internet freedoms, violate your terms of service?
6
16
110
Replying to
Stop giving him a platform. If he doesn't want to play by the rules, he doesn't have to have an account. Twitter will survive without Donald Trump.
82
21
150
Show replies
Replying to
You know, he's probably violated your terms of service a few times. Just something to think about.
3
10
Replying to
Reactionary?! After 4 YEARS of censoring anyone who doesn’t go along with the progressive narrative. Oh, please! 🙄
11
5
150
Replying to
Straw man fallacy.
Twitter users agree to abide by code of conduct rules.
Violation of said rules results in removal of content and/or account.
Trumplicans keep trying to pretend that they're the victims after they engage in hateful conduct and inappropriate behavior.
1
Replying to
Perhaps next time instead of imposing yourself on a tweet from the president of the United States of America , just retweet it with whatever clarification you think is appropriate. That might have avoided all of this mess.
1
4
35