Fair point that can just as easily, and more urgently, be inverted: why don't those building AI for $subject actually engage with the foundational $subject literature? Including the histories of ethics, discrimination, etc in $subject domain...https://twitter.com/jackclarkSF/status/997512143695241217 …
-
-
Replying to @mer__edith
A big factor in that is that AI researchers are often not incentivized and educated to do so. But another part of the answer is that subject literature from the social sciences is often perceived as poor quality, more concerned with ideology than with facts (and unaware of that).
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @Plinz @mer__edith
For instance, most folks understand ethics as something like ‘indoctrination with good values’, instead of principled resolution of conflicts of interest under conditions of shared purpose, etc. We need better social science, and social science education.
11:19 AM - 20 May 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.