As a result, (b) follows - because there's nothing more banal than just spewing clickbait and feigning surprise that their poor-faith arguments are being misunderstood by their opponents.
I am pretty sure that Weinstein and Peterson are motivated by reducing suffering, but they interpret the causes and cures differently than you.
-
-
Some questions: whose suffering do they seek to minimize? How did they decide that? How do they respond to disagreement, to the possibility that they’re wrong? Do you think it’s an accident that they’re mostly white dude? Do you think it matters?
-
Take this little exchange. It’s entirely possible that he means this in good faith, I guess. But does he deserve two seconds of serious consideration? Whose suffering is he trying to fix and whose can he LITERALLY NOT EVEN SEE? https://twitter.com/max_read/status/997473333301137410?s=21 …
This Tweet is unavailable. - 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.