Hyperbole! Not even close to the Turing test. In the TT the human knows they are testing, they can try to be confusing, to catch-out the AI. It is also not confined to a narrow set of topics, nor limited in duration. Eliza, software therapist passed this test decades ago!https://twitter.com/plinz/status/993991552828694528 …
If you take it literally (see Turing's 1950 paper), then computer should fool the jury into thinking that it is a woman and lie about its hair. That is not so interesting. I want to know if it has capacities for understanding that are on par with our own, not if it mimics us.
-
-
Thats my point. Wether behaviour is “interesting” or not, test is to determine intelligence in the only way that makes any sense, in the absence of a definition for intelligence. If the machine is indistinguishable from a human, including lies, evasions and humour it is AI!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.