First principle of epistemology (confidence in belief must equal evidence in support) is the foundation of gaining agency over one's beliefs, but incompatible with many religious narratives. If you get through the school of mysteries, do they eventually tell you this secret?
-
-
As I said: there are no proofs outside of mathematics. If these are genuinely observations, we are outside the scope of mathematics. That said: if the “observations” are produced by an adversarial hypercomputational oracle, then probably yeah you can prove no algorithm wins.
-
Yes, we can show that there may be worlds that maliciously change the rules. Can we prove that the algorithm could not figure that possibility out? (I am ignoring worlds that sabotage your mental state because you cannot be rational if your mind breaks.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
isn't this the "no free lunch theorem"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_free_lunch_theorem …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.