Hypothesis: Leibniz, Descartes, Searle, Tononi, du Bois-Reymond all got confused by how solid stuff in space should produce cognition, when both the apparent structure of space and the apparent properties of cognition arise from changes in informational states
-
-
As defined in current physics, takes up space and time, has volume, etc. You said "solid stuff".. so why that rather than, Bose–Einstein condensates? And by the way, are you basically espousing Goertzel's patternism?
-
What is patternism?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.