Hypothesis: Leibniz, Descartes, Searle, Tononi, du Bois-Reymond all got confused by how solid stuff in space should produce cognition, when both the apparent structure of space and the apparent properties of cognition arise from changes in informational states
-
-
I think that his and Marletto ´s theory of information (if I understood it well) could be interesting to neuroscientists. It has interested me in the context of Tononi ´s reasoning. That is why the concepts of alertness and awarness seemed to me bit “redundant”...
-
Still, I am facing the problem - to your description of consciousness and alertness. I have missed there the term “awareness”, i.e. to be aware of both self and environment...Is it shared by broader term “consciousness” you did use?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.