Obviously. They just don’t have any claim to the null hypothesis.
-
-
Replying to @Plinz @michaelgarfield and
Also, if someone rapes the mind of a student by imprinting untruth, I perceive them as fundamentally confused or violating my first moral principles by removing moral agency from someone who trusts them. I won’t trust such authority any more than a pig should trust the butcher.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't think that an idea can be tainted by the one who has it. But by the same account, no idea can be accepted without having a pretty good idea about why it should be treated as truth.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The teaching of practices is of course a very different thing than the teaching of ontological, moral or ethical precepts.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Absolutely, and each observation has to be explained. The frame of the explanation itself cannot be generated by divine revelation.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
I tend to disagree. Science is simply the systematic, criticizable pursuit of knowledge. The nature of experience is a kind of knowledge, and separation is not the right way. Vipassana may have a scientific and a practical and a cultural aspect.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 10 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.