It is easier to scramble than to unscramble eggs. I think of entropy as an exponential barrier of computational complexity. The fundamental grammar of physics is computation, not "laws". From that, everything follows, including cognition and aesthetic experience. https://twitter.com/sknthla/status/988885476374392832 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @vakibs
“It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards” – Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland. Its all to easy to get caught up in Maya, where entropy matters ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @samim
In Samkhya philosophy, the universe is termed Prakriti and the experiencing self is termed Purusha. The Sanskrit word for computation is Vritti: this word is defined by the grammarian Panini as context-sensitive recursive computation. Only Prakriti has Vrittis. Purusha doesn't.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
In Patanjali's YogaSutras (developed from Samkhya), Yoga is defined as "Yogas chitta vritti nirodhah": Yoga is the complete termination of Vrittis (transformations) of Chitta (faculty of memory). The Vrittis will stop when you step out of time i.e identify with Purusha alone.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This is pragmatically true, but not a statement about physics, but about what you can do to your mind and the universe it constructs. Is there a way to talk about physics in this philosophy? What is its epistemological basis? How can you verify a statement?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
In other words, you are just tripping.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
you are overfitting
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.