It is easier to scramble than to unscramble eggs. I think of entropy as an exponential barrier of computational complexity. The fundamental grammar of physics is computation, not "laws". From that, everything follows, including cognition and aesthetic experience. https://twitter.com/sknthla/status/988885476374392832 …
This is pragmatically true, but not a statement about physics, but about what you can do to your mind and the universe it constructs. Is there a way to talk about physics in this philosophy? What is its epistemological basis? How can you verify a statement?
-
-
The universe outside is not separate from the universe in the mind. Both are the same Prakriti, its evolutes are millionfold, spanning all the space of quantum possibilities, one of which you will wake up in, depending on Karma. But all the evolutes of Prakriti evolve together.
-
The splitting of the universe into its evolute copies is a computational procedure, imagined as the spinning of a disc (Vritta). The evolutes can move away from Purusha at the center of the disc (which is termed Vritti) or they can move closer to it (which is termed Pratyahara).
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't trust any complex mathematical (a priori) conclusion without a proof, because my mind is weak, and other people's minds are usually not much better. How do you know that something is "absolutely correct"?
- 2 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.