The Sapir Whorf hypothesis (language defines what we can perceive and think) is mostly wrong for natural language, but true for programming. Computer languages don't differ in what they can do but in how they let us think.
-
-
yes, with well founded, thought out and refined opinions. Which is why I assume that the probability that they correspond to objective facts is high.
-
Nah, I am just very good at tricking myself. Don't be tricked by me too!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.