Much like boolean algebra isn't fundamental to computing & programming in an abstract sense, but rather is an arbitrary low-level design choice, I don't think brains are fundamental to intelligence. I'd posit the most compact substrate for defining cognition is mathematics.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @fchollet
Classical mathematics is unfortunately timeless, so we want to narrow it down to constructionist mathematics, which happens to be identical to computation. Boolean algebra is simply one of the many automata that equivalently define universal computation. Even NAND is enough.
1 reply 4 retweets 10 likes -
Nand That's All, Folks!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Nor this!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The correct way to describe cognition is through physics. Mathematics is just a branch of physics. Just as philosophy is just a branch of psychology. All useful abstractions are grounded in reality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IntuitMachine @BobKerns and
Ugh. I am not sure if I can understand what you get out of this kind of sloppy thinking.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Perhaps you need references?
@GeorgeLakoff Philosophy is just a branch of Psychology. David Hestenes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItGlUbFBFfc … . Any questions?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IntuitMachine @BobKerns and
Yes, I know their arguments. I don't think that they are convincing. You may have noticed that some (even good!) psychologists tend not to have a deep understanding of mathematics.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I was referring to Lakoff's characterization of philosophy and Hestenes characterization of mathematics. The commonality here is the requirement for all thought be grounded. This is a principle that is no less convincing than the principle of parsimony.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think the intuition that drives you and Lakoff is that there must be an ultimate source of priors, "out there" in reality. But there are only patterns, all order must be mathematically constructed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.