Every intelligent act/person is intelligent in the same way Every stupid act/person is stupid in a different way Intelligence and stupidity aren't duals, and not even very correlated. The same person/act can be both at once. Your stupidities define you far more than your IQ
-
-
Replying to @vgr
um, I think your theory is... intelligent in a different way
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
It’s a refinement of what I was calling boundary intelligence earlier https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/915302752720322560.html …
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
I see what you are trying to do here. Yet there seem to be several modes of intelligently creating models and policies that vary eg by the probability we assign to unproven concepts, and their success depends on environmental factors. Conversely, we can classify stupidities, too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
If there’s a concept you can assign a probability to you’re already in a model. “Black swan” is already a model. Just because it is pre-statistical does not mean it’s not a model at all. I’m trying to thread the needle between percepts and phenomenology or something
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
There is never not a model. Minds are machines to identify the relationships between changes in information. Everything that is not noise to us is a model of such relationships
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
When we construct a model, we usually need to explore a space that requires us to consider weak proof candidates. There's a tradeoff btw exploration & exploitation, for which our minds might be too small to find the regulation function, so we solve it with diversity of creativity
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.