I'm not a religious person, but surely atheists have better arguments than this! If so, why can brains make computers but computers can't make brains?https://twitter.com/Micksparklfc/status/974646192054439936 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
That's like saying I'm going to define a fish as anything that moves of its own accord, therefore, you are wrong to say that fish live in the water - or that people aren't really fish.
Sorry, but this is comparable to a comp scientist lecturing an anthropologist on some topic specific to anthropology. What is or isn't fish is defined by ichthyologists and other biologists, and what is a computer is defined by computer scientists.
if brains are ALREADY computers, as that definition implies, you would not be able to say computers will eventually make brains because there is no difference between the two. If there is a difference, my objection still holds. Be consistent!
If all brains are computers, it does not follow that all computers are brains.
it never occurred to me that scientists are that lacking in basic logic skills. I'm assuming they really aren't and you are offering an extremely poor representation of what they actually think. I hope so!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.