The problem with theories like mirror neurons or IIT is not that they are wrong, but that they are superstitious. Their proposed elements have no way in which they could actually produce the result they pretend to explain.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I disagree. The scope of relevant problems might seem large to us, but why should it be to a planet size AI? Furthermore, the upper boundary of any problem's difficulty is given by how hard it is to circumvent the reward function and wirehead.
- 16 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.