The problem with theories like mirror neurons or IIT is not that they are wrong, but that they are superstitious. Their proposed elements have no way in which they could actually produce the result they pretend to explain.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @examachine @Plinz
In any case, it seems that close contact between neuroscientists and AI scientists is a bit missing...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @examachine @RJsnda
This is a thing that I don't understand. Either you care about the acclaim of your peers, in which case you try to play by the rules of the culture. Or you dismiss mortal human status games, in which case only your results matter and not their current reception.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Science is to academia like religion is to the church. One is per definition supremely noble, and the other is the hackjob that results from the actual incentives. But if you decide that you reject the social game, why continue to be outraged by it?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.