The problem with theories like mirror neurons or IIT is not that they are wrong, but that they are superstitious. Their proposed elements have no way in which they could actually produce the result they pretend to explain.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The problem is that Tononi and Koch have assigned properties to consciousness that are incompatible with functionalism, i.e. they want to explain a phenomenon that is outside the scope of computational theories. Give them some credit for trying the impossible!
- 24 more replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But I think I get his intuition! If he is sincerely convinced that consciousness offers immediate experience, he can see that constructionist, reductionist models cannot deliver that. Hence the phenomenon must be explained *before* we take material interaction apart in space.
- 3 more replies
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.