The problem with theories like mirror neurons or IIT is not that they are wrong, but that they are superstitious. Their proposed elements have no way in which they could actually produce the result they pretend to explain.
-
-
So what is YOUR goal here? And do you actually think anyone out there is saying that these things "ARE THE CAUSE OF" anything in particular. Because I only see folks saying that mirror neurons might play a role in modeling (and thus internally understanding) others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, how does your theory of consciousness differ from IIT? (I have seen some of your ideas, but I'm not sure I understand how they all come together to a coherent general approach of what it is.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.