-
-
Curious 2see if these 2 apropos & nuanced descriptions of eschatology (end of thjngs) & vocation (participation / intelligent calling 2engage / make things better) by
@DallasAWillard support or challenge ur p.o.v.: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7707915-this-present-universe-is-only-one-element-in-the-kingdom … https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7332291-in-any-case-we-should-expect-that-in-due-time … My fav line
pic.twitter.com/fBEpQmREuV
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @micahtredding @bierlingm and
Or... B) (Maybe check our Ilia Delio & catholicity) is it union & co-creation / co-stewardship? Via whatever game/model we are in?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @luke_dawgfan @bierlingm and
The ultimate value is another being who can create freely. This is why scripture always posits us as God's children—we are intended to grow up and bring about new possibilities and new life.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @micahtredding @bierlingm and
Ok this is rough, and somewhat hastily penned by me last summer... but curious if it relates to this conversation: http://www.metanoiamemo.com/2017/06/trauma-threats-virtue-and-ai-in-cloud.html?m=1 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @luke_dawgfan @micahtredding and
Minds don't naturally want anything, not even survival or quiescence. The reward function is always an external imposition, and eventually the question is (for natural and artificial minds) whether it is more difficult for the mind to get the reward or to hack its reward system.
3 replies 3 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @luke_dawgfan and
Then maybe a pure artificial mind without external impositions is more natural than a "natural" mind driven by artificial desire and aversion.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RitaJKing @Plinz and
Semantics. What a mind naturally wants is in question; not what an artificial intelligence wants. Having meditated on this I'm desirous (pun intended) to get the primary level here. ?? redux: what does a mind (a person's consciousness) orient towards? (as a precursor to desire)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @luke_dawgfan @Plinz and
I dislike the term artificial intelligence and prefer AI to stand for applied imagination, which is required to think clearly about what problems we are trying to solve, as well as why and how.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I see intelligence as the ability to create models, and imagination as the ability to change the latent variables (the variant state space) of the models (structural invariance) we have found. So AI still seems apt to me, even though I like "applied imagination".
-
-
Replying to @Plinz @luke_dawgfan and
Do you see those created models as artificial?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RitaJKing @luke_dawgfan and
Only if we build the modeling systems ourselves.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.