is your model of observer a communicating sequential process?
-
-
-
What does it mean to be communicating, and can the sequence involve parallelism?
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In part or in full?
-
Imagine that an observer starts its existence as a little curl in spacetime. Everything it becomes (all structural properties and its stored history) is going to be the result of what the entangled universe, including the part that is the observer itself, are doing to it.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Any observer must be a computer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can suspend motivational reactions but not physical ones. And if someone suspends the physical reactions of your nervous system, you won’t observe qualia.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think that qualia might be memories of what experiencing something must have felt like to the fictional observer generated by our brain. What do you think are they?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Same here!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is cool because it works when the observer observe itself and when it observed anything ''outside'' itself, so for being an observer you just need to be able to compute in any sense. I guess that permeable and fractal systems are observers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My digi cam observes me?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.