This one: http://quillette.com/2018/01/25/ethical-case-conservation/ … or that one: http://www.jpe.ox.ac.uk/papers/consistent-vegetarianism-and-the-suffering-of-wild-animals …
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
Ein Blogartikel vs ein wissenschaftliches Paper, bisschen unfair, oder? ;) Im ersten Text viele Behauptungen, im zweiten viele Belege. Deckt sich mit meinem subjektiven Eindruck vom allgemeinen Umgang mit dem Thema. Das Dogma ist stark in diesem.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @voigaas
There is no reason to judge blog articles and scientific papers differently, and it is hard to make a philosophical contribution that does more than restating the obvious. I just wanted to use the texts as pointers to two ideas, one common but hard to defend, and the alternative.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
(Maybe I also misunderstood your answer, it's late and it was a long day. PS: I wish philosophical statements were obvious to more people I know. Could make the world less of an "I am right!!1"-place.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The general human opinion space is not a good habitat for a seriously curious mind, is that much not obvious? Also, I don't think that the humans are to blame for refusing to waste synapses on holding opinions that they have no reason to consider useful to them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.