I think I have to read his first book to see what he proposes. One problem seems to be our religions are failing to keep societies together. They also seem not sophisticated enough and don't provide adequate programming of humans for a healthy existence in a modern society. /3
I think of government as both an agent to impose offsets on the local incentives of its subjects, to make their local Nash equilibria compatible with an improved global outcome, and a platform to negotiate preferred outcomes and conflicts between these preferences.
-
-
Realistically, governments cannot make all subjects an equally good offer, yet it wants to minimize to incentivize by violence, so all governments like the majority of their subjects to be a bit befuddled about their true incentives.
-
The probably most important thing you need in any social system is that it produces justice that is compatible with our evolutionally hardwired system for perception of fairness, which might give us helpful constraints in modeling such a system one day, but it sounds very hard.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.