very much so ;)
-
-
"Everything that exists must be implemented." – do *possibilities* not exist which are not implemented?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PeterSjostedtH @samim
Per definitionem, possibilities don't ontologically exist, but inaccessible parts of the universe might well be implemented.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
To say that possibilities do not ontologically exist betrays the fact that one's ontology is flawed. Of course possibilities exist.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
-
Replying to @samim @PeterSjostedtH
Nothing wrong with complex numbers as long as you discretize them :)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz @PeterSjostedtH
Why stop there? Nothing wrong with fairies, as long as you discretize them :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @samim @PeterSjostedtH
Do you have a set of phenomena that can be plausibly explained by fairies, a plausible implementation of faerie, and a plausible mechanism by which they came into existence?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Are you denying the existence of the possibility of the fae without such a set of phenomena?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
No, but it dramatically reduces the likelihood.
-
-
So you accept the existence of possibilities after all.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PeterSjostedtH @samim
I thought you had misspelled the "possibility of existence". I think you can talk about existence of possibilities in the same sense as you can talk about the existence of other Platonic entities, but that is not an ontological sense.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 13 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.