The menu of things that should be must logically be restrained to the things that could be. The better we understand why things are as they are, the smaller the set of alternatives that could be, until only a single trajectory is left, in which we can make only our own decisions.
OK, by this definition I am probably much more of an idiot than the FHI people, which are driven by a mixture of higher calling and an egotistical need to pay the bills without being driven insane by boredom.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.