Only if you already assume to live in a universe where God can somehow compute uncomputable things.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @Meaningness and
At this point, we only know how to build machines that map from int to int, even in hypothetical universes we don't really know how to get general hypercomputers to work. That might be a shortcoming of our current understanding, but perhaps this is just how the cookie crumbles?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @Meaningness and
As far as I understand, the set of functions computable by a reasonably resource bounded QTM is different from a resource bounded TM?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @Meaningness and
If you run your TM to infinity then it can do amazing things, of course, but we are talking about mappings from finite int to finite int vs. real to real, or real to complex to complex to real.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @Meaningness and
I think all realizable machines are finitely bounded, so while your argument is mathematically correct, it may not be relevant for our universe.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I have spent a large part of my metaphysical life in a hypercomputational universe, now like to invite people over for visits to the computational one; we have great parties, also we are literally infinitely more likely to be real :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.