You can get spatial superposition by projecting the distribution of the results of an unfinished but dimensionally constrained computation in a higher dimensional space, for instance.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @Meaningness and
We project particle systems into a 3space, but what if a traveling regularity in the universe graph is insufficiently constrained to map it to 3 dimensions? It will occupy a region in computationally expensive ways, but only if we insist on computing the missing spatial indices.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @Meaningness and
I don't think that particles are best understood as discrete objects, in the same way as gliders in Game of Life are not discrete objects, but stable emergent patterns. Likewise, I don't think that there is anything continuous in this universe.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
The models that don't give rise to symmetrically behaving stable traveling attractors that can let typed, directed information move and interact in near continuous ways cannot form the kinds of observers that we are.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.