Superposition is not a sufficient motivation for this?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @Meaningness and
You can get spatial superposition by projecting the distribution of the results of an unfinished but dimensionally constrained computation in a higher dimensional space, for instance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @Meaningness and
We project particle systems into a 3space, but what if a traveling regularity in the universe graph is insufficiently constrained to map it to 3 dimensions? It will occupy a region in computationally expensive ways, but only if we insist on computing the missing spatial indices.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @Meaningness and
I don't think that particles are best understood as discrete objects, in the same way as gliders in Game of Life are not discrete objects, but stable emergent patterns. Likewise, I don't think that there is anything continuous in this universe.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
I suspect that this is some kind of anthropic effect; we are built on a set of regularities that allows the kind of particle interactions that make our chemistry and biology possible; the rest just dissipates or looks like noise to us.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.