is a bit ironic that I am a anti-authoritarian who promotes a military dictatorship of earth
#Government #PhilosophyOfExistence #Policy #DecisionTheory #IntelligenceRulehttps://twitter.com/Plinz/status/950432437527556097 …
-
-
Replying to @Eschersand
Every working society is built around a death star, but the folks maintaining it should not form the administration if it can be helped. You want to remove the option for violence, but rule via civil negotiation, not terror.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
to flip that a bit, in the sense of prisoner reform i guess, but that's really a complicated subject as we phase from nonsentient evolution to a sentient regime and end of social gov theory Temporal math: Science > Biodiversity > Transient entities [universal existential key]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eschersand
If we manage to completely align our social structure with inclusive fitness I am disinterested. I find the idea of being selected subservient to a yeast god repulsive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
yet bacterial biomass is worth more then the temp. human race. is where the bulk of earths billions yrs of evolutionary intelligence (infinity games on surface of the quantum ocean) is contained, the more that is lost the longer real time sentient evolution takes to develop, yes?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eschersand
Given a large enough surface, prokaryotic evolution is blindingly fast when compared to geological time spans. Eukaryotic evolution seems to have a larger search space and is more prone to local optima before it gets to general intelligence. And we don't seem to be sustainable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @Eschersand
Ah, correction. The problem with evolving large multicellular critters is that the numbers of individuals are very small, generations are extremely long, and dependencies on habitat and food chain ecology are complicated, when compared to single celled organisms.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
you'd probably have to be a condensed matter researcher to even begin to comprehend the scale of computational complexity of nature. (and valuation via processing time) .. or perhaps the subject is over humanities head entirely. I suppose Elon Musk suffers from the same handicap
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Eschersand @Plinz
but yea, when say 'billions of years of evolutionary intelligence', every subsecond of that time is like a googleplex of infinity of games which is window into understanding why nature is so valuable to superintelligence, so important to the future sentient evolution of all life
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The evolutionary complexity of organisms is relatively low when compared to the complexity of the organization of matter itself, but that is because it is so hard to build a cell, and organisms only exist above cells.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.