This represents a misreading of my paper. I asked if we would hit a wall, and impicitly said no, provided that we started doing other stuff like adding in symbol-manipulating primitives. If if we do that, we can avoid the wall. I’m just suggesting how we ought to steer. @Plinzhttps://twitter.com/dougblank/status/950393794377240576 …
-
-
This
#SEP entry pays attention also to a fair share of critics of (different flavors of) CTMs: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computational-mind/ … Generally many variants of 4E#cognition claim to be non-computational. (IMHO often making up straw man arguments about what CTMs are, but who am I to decide...) -
Do you see a way to take strong enactivism seriously as a philosophical enterprise?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.