This really shows the egocentricity of the human perspective in flashy neon.
-
-
-
To be fair, perhaps these are really the best arguments? And the author puts the probability that they work at 1%. Perhaps a bit optimistic, but hey.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think it would care. But these kinds of articles are funny, in what they tell you about human psychology. Praying to the superhuman AI will probably be just effective as this manifesto.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on what AI finds meaningful. We don’t know that for sure.
-
It turns out that meaning does not exist, it is just a projection of our mind, as usual in the service of evolutionary goals. This allows us to make some inferences about possible self-consistent systems of meaning.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think we should just focus on tolerable levels of murder ) You know, like when AI saves billions from disease but kills dozens for experimenting.
-
These questions have no easy universally acceptable answer. But more importantly: hiw can we ensure that we get more say about our destiny than chimps did over theirs?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Even if we get a possibly surprising answer to the Fermi paradox (we're suuuuuuper special and perhaps the one of the first tech civs), we're still but a stage in evolution. If you super intelligence wants to kill ya, start saying your prayers to Turing and Neumann.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.