But I am sure we can make safe AI ... https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/business/computer-flaws.html … https://fb.me/5gC7KlOdg
Turil, safe AI is about existential risk, not diversity of outcome. The attempt to build strong AI is a bit like trying to make a new type of nuclear power plant that has an unknown probability of blowing up the whole planet, but only if it works.
-
-
I see everything we DNA-designed beings do as aiming to generate more options, for more resiliency/fitness. Natural selection weeds out the maladaptive. So adaptive stuff is our aim. AI helps life create more options.
-
Yes, I see that you see it like this. But AI is a different game. AI not just a technology but Life 3.0. It is very hard to create a scenario where it won't replace us.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The more paths we are able to create, the more easily we can avoid the more dangerous ones. So creating options is the "safest" way to go. The risk comes from pursuing only one path.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.