I think I found a way to get computationalism fully to work, and its fundamental algebra is the boolean automaton, but I am worried that fully accepting the solution will turn me in into a boolean automaton. If I am wrong, I will lose consciousness, if I am right, I never had it.
Yes, ANN and 'conditional excite/distribute' neuron use different approximator paradigms. But both are computational abstractions. What if the correct abstraction is metacomputational, and we cannot get there from computationalism?
-
-
So, contextual adaptation is a self defense of preservation of self. Then would what people call a “creative person” be in a perpetual state of defense? Wouldn’t the biological body react to harness the most favorable conditions for contextual adaptation?


-
That might be an issue unrelated to the above discussion?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.