The minimal explanation for what is going on still requires that something must hold the state of the universe and execute its transition function. This prime mover, the basic Turing machine ticking away in the void is a debt that freaks me out.
I don't see how a potential would exist. There is only what is. "What could be" is a predictive model of an observer. Models feel "real" to the observer, but they are not.
-
-
I hear you, but we're missing each other on some semantic point. A filter question, then. Would the *relation* 2+2=4 still be a *fact* in a hypothetical void/non-universe, where there are no things to have four of?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.