Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
Plinz's profile
Joscha Bach
Joscha Bach
Joscha Bach
@Plinz

Tweets

Joscha Bach

@Plinz

FOLLOWS YOU. Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Architectures, Computation. The goal is integrity, not conformity.

San Francisco, CA
bach.ai
Joined April 2009

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Atheistsplaining‏ @TheodoreBolha 12 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Plinz @sarefo and

      We can only do what occurs to us, and what occurs to our brains is not in our control. If so, you would somehow think the thoughts before you think them. The universe is unfolding the one and only way it possibly can.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. vakibs‏ @vakibs 12 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @TheodoreBolha @Plinz and

      There is no proof that the universe is unfolding in one and only way. In fact, it might be unfolding in zillion different ways from where an observer stands in time. One observer might go along one path and another might go in a different path. Each thinks the history is unique.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    3. Joscha Bach‏ @Plinz 12 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @vakibs @TheodoreBolha and

      In which case you have different universes, since they don't interact beyond sharing a single state, so neither of the observers needs to worry about the idea (or could have evidence) that other observers and their universes exist.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. vakibs‏ @vakibs 13 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Plinz @TheodoreBolha and

      The universes might interact.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    5. Joscha Bach‏ @Plinz 13 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @vakibs @TheodoreBolha and

      The universe with respect to an observer is only the causal network that feeds back to him. All causal branches that cannot lead back are part of a different universe. Thus, we can be in a setup like the one you have in mind but it makes no difference.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. vakibs‏ @vakibs 13 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Plinz @TheodoreBolha and

      I think there is only one universe. But the link of causality is constrained for certain observers who cannot see the othe paths in which the universe is unfolding. But it is not true always. For example, the double slit experiment in quantum interference.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Joscha Bach‏ @Plinz 13 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @vakibs @TheodoreBolha and

      If we cannot have any evidence for the number of universes in existence, it is logically wrong to have a nonzero confidence in the belief that there is only one. What would such evidence look like? Likewise, speculation about observers in other universes is pointless.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    8. vakibs‏ @vakibs 13 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Plinz @TheodoreBolha and

      We disagree merely about how we define the word "universe". I am sticking to the etymology of the word: uni+verse.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    9. Joscha Bach‏ @Plinz 13 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @vakibs @TheodoreBolha and

      Isn't it confusing to pick meaning for words that cannot have a referent with assignable truth values?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. vakibs‏ @vakibs 13 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Plinz @TheodoreBolha and

      Life is confusing :) There are many concepts for which truth values cannot be assigned. We try to do the best with what we have (language). Sometimes we convey meaning. It is easier to convey meaning when there is a human on the other side, and not a computer.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Joscha Bach‏ @Plinz 13 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @vakibs @TheodoreBolha and

      By the way, thank you for your pointer wrt. diverging but partially interactive multiverses (I was stuck there for a while too). This made me discover an important argument against the monadic perspective and may lead to deeper insights!

      10:17 AM - 13 Dec 2017
      • 1 Like
      • samim
      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Joscha Bach‏ @Plinz 13 Dec 2017
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @Plinz @vakibs and

          Basically, try to construct a highly connected substrate graph with information flowing along its links, and for each node try find subset of nodes/links that forms a deterministic causal network. Anthropic principle, and we are in one of the solutions? How to derive uniformity?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. David Kedmey‏ @DKedmey 13 Dec 2017
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @Plinz @vakibs and

          The *best* pointer to deeper insights via the multiverse is David Deutsch. Have you read any of his stuff? Fabric of Reality, Beginning of Infinity or Constructor Theory? http://constructortheory.org  Would love to hear your take on any of these.

          3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. 5 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info