Ahhh. I hadn't thought of it that way just yet. Thinking about flows of information certainly feels like I'm thinking about an underlying structure. But I'm not sure that everything has an underlying structure. Oh I just remembered another statement for my theory!
It is possible to mathematically define hypercomputable functions that involve infinite vectors of bits. Such functions are required to describe continuous transitions (for instance in space and time) with infinite resolution.
-
-
There is reason to doubt that our universe implements hypercomputation. There is disagreement in physics whether we live in a computable (fully discretizable) or hypercomputational universe.
-
That was a good explanation, I kinda get it!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.