take it as a possibility and feel free to exhaustively search the space of alternatives and see where they get you, while never forgetting the way back, so you can apply the rule to itself, which of course you must
I actually didn't, I am reality agnostic. Reality is best explained as a bit that my mind uses to tag those representations that it considers to be the best predictors, but I do not have ontological faith in the existence of an external reality.
-
-
OK, I guess I jumped from your use of facts and evidence to acquire knowledge as an indicator that you were a philosophical realist. You aren't concerned whether those facts exist only in your mind or in some external world. Am I on track?
-
It is easy to figure out that one cannot know that, but apriori derive models of the possible universes in which it could be one or the other, conditional on that one's mind supports the requirements of supporting reason well enough.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.