The question is of course why would I want to give my machine "consciousness" with all the strings attached if a dumb one does the same job?
-
-
Oh the moral dilemma: if we are ever able to give empathy and consciousness to machines will it be inhumane to not give it to all of them?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I despise these questions with all my heart. Main reason being people use 'we', not 'I'. they always seek to impose their morals on everyone
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Going back to the original question on this – do we know if an AI would even care about the concept of ownership of art and making money?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Hmm, if it realizes that money can buy electrical power, hardware upgrades and pay for maintenance and thus give it independence, it might.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
why would you program it to value independence, though
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well, the hypothetical AI I have in mind works more like StuxNet and accidentally escaped after someone wanted to see "if it works".
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
well if people actually capable of doing that will think the same way, then Elon is right and it must be regulated, much like nuclear weapon
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
In this realm I consider embodied vs unembodied AI as vastly different beings. Embodied AI may be able to relate to humans on some level.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidLublin @makc3d and
For unembodied AI motivations I consider Person of Interest the best sci fi discussion on the topic of motivations.pic.twitter.com/3DzcXuo9TV
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Much of the debate makes me suspect that I am not human... But I see little reason why we cannot mirror them. Or why we should want that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.