Why abomination?
I find the tendency for scholasticism (argument from [sometimes even fictional] authority) most confusing! You can deduce it all by yourself
-
-
It is not argument for authority. I am relating different opinions from history. It is like citing prior literature. You need not agree.
-
But Buddha is just one guy, his observations an anecdote. Jeffery Martin has documented interviews with a thousand folks in similar states.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
when arguing about nirvana & no-thing-ness, isn't it all just somewhat arbitrary semantics? I'll go with D.Adams 42 today & fnord tomorrow.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.