@Nick_Haflinger soviel zum Thema Interdisziplinarität und Geschichtsbewusstsein in der heutigen Kognitionswissenschaft
https://twitter.com/Plinz/status/881211541198172160 …
-
-
Replying to @metasprech @Nick_Haflinger
Weder bin ich ein guter Repräsentant des Feldes, noch ignoriere ich die Ideengeschichte. Ich beobachte das nur!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @Nick_Haflinger
Eine wirkmächtige Kritik an der symbolic AI kam übrigens von einem - oh schreck! - Philosophen, Hubert Dreyfus. Die Geschichte gab ihm Recht
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @metasprech @Nick_Haflinger
I read Dreyfus as useful critique of early symbolic approaches. Taken literally he was wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @Nick_Haflinger
Exactly what I said: *symbolic* AI. My point was that he used precisely Philosophy, ideas of the past, to criticize the cognitivist approach
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @metasprech @Nick_Haflinger
At the same time, he was unable to understand the computational nature of minds, because he was stuck with Heidegger.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @metasprech
The Turing computational nature of the universe as well as of the mind is a metaphysical presumption :)
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Nick_Haflinger @metasprech
It could also be hypercomputational, but the likely computational class is an empirical question.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, just probability assessments
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.