So, I should have done more diligence on this “conceptual penis” thing before tweeting about it, and now feel somewhat stupid.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
David Chapman Retweeted St. Rev ☯️ 🏴 😻
.
@St_Rev (and others) were immediately skeptical, and were right to be so.https://twitter.com/St_Rev/status/865939540510470144 …David Chapman added,
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
Here’s the background: http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2017/05/concep … They submitted to a less-bad journal first, it was rejected, and they sent it to a junk one.
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
This is not just a wasted opportunity, it discredits skepticism about junk social science generally. Sokalling will be harder in future.
3 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
I agree that the celebration misses the significance. But how can you possibly sokalize feminist glaciology etc. any further?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
That’s part of why their sloppiness may be really damaging. It ought to have been easy to get bs accepted by a reputable journal.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
What could anyone do that adds anything important on top of Hjernevask to point out the problems with the discipline?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It is really well done, contrasting interviews with scientists with Norwegian gender studies scholars, thereby creating a virtual debate
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.